I’m on the side of privacy. I think data brokers are a menace, and when Ireland fined Meta €1.2 billion in 2023 I didn’t lose a minute’s sleep. If Europe wants a law that stops companies from selling where people sleep at night, I’ll help write it. My argument is narrower, and harsher. The General Data Protection Regulation (99 articles, 173 recitals, in force since May 2018) has failed on its own terms.

Pink News has proposed cutting up to eleven staff, its second round of redundancies this year, and the stated reason is a change in how the platform distributes publisher content. The platform is Snapchat. Snapchat generates the large majority of the publisher’s revenue. That last detail is the whole story. Everything else is just the arithmetic playing out. The deal that looked like a gift Platform publishing programmes always arrive on generous terms.

Three years into the argument about AI and content, publishers have sorted themselves into two strategies. One camp licenses. The other sues. A few run both at once, and those are the ones worth studying. News Corp is the clearest example. It licensed to OpenAI in a deal reported at up to 250 million dollars over five years, signed a further arrangement with Meta reported at up to fifty million a year for three years, and simultaneously sued Perplexity through Dow Jones and the New York Post, describing what it alleged as content kleptocracy.

Sylvester Stallone has launched a memoir covering five decades of Hollywood stardom, and the timing makes sense in ways that go beyond the commercial. At 79, Stallone occupies a position in American popular culture that has outlasted several cycles of critical reassessment. Rocky was dismissed by parts of the critical establishment as sentimental before the Academy awarded it Best Picture. Rambo was read as Reagan-era propaganda before action cinema scholars began treating it as a more complicated document.

There is a particular kind of afternoon that WordPress users know well. It begins with a minor irritation — an option that does not behave, a setting that appears to have no effect, a folder structure that persists despite being told not to. It ends, some hours later, in the same place it started, except now there are seventeen browser tabs open and a vague sense that the problem was never really the problem.

The archive is not a neutral repository. Every decision made in its construction — what to collect, what to discard, how to classify, who is permitted access — is an act of historical production. The archive does not wait passively for historians to come and read what is there. It determines, in advance, what histories can be written. This is not a conspiracy. It is a structural condition. Colonial archives are the clearest case.