Hugo is fast and file-based, but its editing experience is entirely command-line: you write Markdown in a text editor, commit to Git, and push to trigger a build. For solo developers this is fine. For publications with non-technical contributors, it is a significant barrier. Decap CMS (formerly Netlify CMS) solves this by adding a browser-based editorial interface to Hugo without abandoning the static site architecture. What Decap CMS Is Decap CMS is an open-source, Git-backed content management interface.

The term “headless CMS” gets used loosely enough that it has started to lose meaning in some conversations. Publishers evaluating content infrastructure deserve a clear definition, a realistic picture of the tradeoffs, and an honest sense of when the architecture is actually the right fit. What “Headless” Means A traditional CMS — WordPress, Drupal, Joomla — couples content management with content presentation. The system stores your posts in a database, applies templates to them, and renders HTML pages.

WordPress Multisite is a feature built into WordPress core that enables a single WordPress installation to power a network of independent sites. Each site in the network has its own content, users, and settings, while sharing a single codebase, plugin installation, and server infrastructure. For publishers operating multiple properties, it is worth understanding clearly — including where it helps and where it creates problems. What WordPress Multisite Is Activating Multisite converts a standard WordPress installation into a network.

A slow WordPress site costs you readers and search rankings. Core Web Vitals are a direct Google ranking factor, and reader tolerance for slow page loads is low — measured in seconds, not minutes. The good news is that WordPress performance problems are largely solved problems. The fixes are well-understood, the tools are mature, and the gains from a properly optimized installation are substantial. This is a systematic walkthrough of what actually moves the needle.

WordPress is the most attacked CMS on the internet not because it is inherently insecure but because it is the most common. Its market share makes it the highest-return target for automated scanning and exploitation. A default WordPress installation is not a hardened one — but hardening it is straightforward, well-documented work that most publishers skip until something goes wrong. This checklist covers the high-impact measures that materially reduce your attack surface.

For publishers setting up a new site — or reconsidering an old one — the choice between WordPress and Hugo comes up constantly. Both are capable, widely used, and well-supported, but they represent fundamentally different philosophies about how a website should work. Picking the wrong one creates friction you will feel every day. The Core Difference WordPress is a dynamic content management system. Every time a visitor loads a page, WordPress queries a database, assembles the page from PHP templates and stored content, and serves the result.

WPGraphQL is an open-source WordPress plugin that adds a fully featured GraphQL API to any WordPress installation. It transforms WordPress from a self-contained CMS into a content platform queryable by any GraphQL client — a Next.js front end, a mobile app, a Hugo build process, or any other consumer capable of making HTTP requests. The REST API built into WordPress core works, but GraphQL solves problems the REST API does not handle elegantly: over-fetching unnecessary fields, under-fetching requiring multiple round-trips, and querying relational data efficiently.

SEO plugins are load-bearing infrastructure for WordPress publishers. The two dominant options — Yoast SEO and RankMath — both handle the fundamentals competently, but they differ in philosophy, feature set, and interface in ways that matter depending on how your editorial operation works. What Both Plugins Actually Do Before comparing them, it helps to be clear about what an SEO plugin handles. Neither Yoast nor RankMath makes your content rank. What they do is manage the technical scaffolding that helps search engines understand and index your content correctly.

Trade flows between the United States and Mexico get most of the headlines, but the investment relationship underpinning them is equally substantial — and has grown dramatically over the past quarter century. U.S. foreign direct investment in Mexico stood at $159.2 billion in 2024, up from $37.2 billion in 1999. That 328% increase reflects a sustained commitment by American firms to production facilities, distribution networks, and service operations south of the border.

Mexico surpassed Canada as the top U.S. trading partner in goods and services in 2024, and held that position through 2025 with $976.1 billion in total bilateral trade. That figure — approaching a trillion dollars — reflects a relationship that has been decades in the making and is now deeply wired into the structure of both economies. In goods alone, total U.S.-Mexico trade reached $872.8 billion in 2025, with the United States importing $534.