<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>perplexity on Publishing House</title>
    <link>https://publishinghouse.org/tags/perplexity/</link>
    <description>Recent content in perplexity on Publishing House</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://publishinghouse.org/tags/perplexity/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Publishers Have Split Into Two Camps on AI, and News Corp Is in Both</title>
      <link>https://publishinghouse.org/publishers-have-split-into-two-camps-on-ai-and-news-corp-is-in-both/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://publishinghouse.org/publishers-have-split-into-two-camps-on-ai-and-news-corp-is-in-both/</guid>
      <description>Three years into the argument about AI and content, publishers have sorted themselves into two strategies. One camp licenses. The other sues. A few run both at once, and those are the ones worth studying.
News Corp is the clearest example. It licensed to OpenAI in a deal reported at up to 250 million dollars over five years, signed a further arrangement with Meta reported at up to fifty million a year for three years, and simultaneously sued Perplexity through Dow Jones and the New York Post, describing what it alleged as content kleptocracy.</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>
